[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technique

To: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>,"Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technique
From: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:58:43 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
>> Well, an option would be for all SO2R ops to use "callsign/SO2R", but 
>> that would be worse than those who use "callsign/QRP" and take up 
>> everyone's time in a contest ;-(
> Plus, SO2R is a valid call sign:
> http://www.qrz.com/callsign/SO2R

Plus, it presupposes that SO2R ops are worthy of special consideration. This 
isn't a slag against SO2R, as I'm sure most SO2R ops would agree that their 
run frequency isn't any more guaranteed by virtue of 2R operation than were 
they 1R.

73, kelly
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>