CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] A New Perspective [was:WRTC Spot/Log Correlation]

To: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] A New Perspective [was:WRTC Spot/Log Correlation]
From: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:15:30 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:48:43PM -0700, Radiosporting Fan wrote:
> 
> I'll try framing things another way...
> 
> What if categories (as they are established and
> defined by the contest sponsor in today's world) were
> *replaced* by requiring stations to reveal the
> conditions under which *they* attained the score that
> they did?

Operators that are inclined to cheat today would
still lie about the conditions under which they attained 
their scores.

-- 
Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
kenharker@kenharker.com
http://www.kenharker.com/

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>