CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Definition of Non-Assisted

To: sawyered@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Definition of Non-Assisted
From: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:10:21 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Ed,

I am on the ARRL Contest Advisory Committee, but I am not going to 
comment because the official position comes from the contest department 
at ARRL HQ.  After all, our committee has "advisory" in its name.

My PERSONAL OPINION is the W5OV's recent e-mail on this topic is right 
on point.

73,

Dave/K8CC


 sawyered@earthlink.net wrote:
> Could someone from both the ARRL and CQ Contest Committees comment on this 
> statement being accurate?
>
> "Actually a better way to put this would be "using the internet to solicit 
> contacts" which is what you are doing if your radio spots come from the 
> internet, as is common practice now, but for some reason the name "packet"
> still remains.  Technically if you had your old 2M radio, TNC and computer 
> terminal connected to a ham packet node, you would not be violating the 
> rule." from Mark, N5OT 
>
> A packet connection to an internet server is "communicating by radio means"?  
> I certainly hope not.  
>
> How many non-assisted ops are using this interpretation of this rule I 
> wonder....
>
> Ed  N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>   


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>