CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ] Incorrect conclusions about unassisted versusassisted

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ] Incorrect conclusions about unassisted versusassisted
From: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:35:11 -0600 (CST)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Maybe because you couldn't know with complete certainty in most cases 
unless you were actually there at the station, and if you turn out to be 
wrong, you could be getting yourself in a lot of trouble.

Here's a question on another topic:  What would you do if you heard a 
station make, say, three more QSO's after your clock indicates the contest 
is over, and the station finally quits when someone says to him "Contest 
is up!" ?

73, Zack W9SZ


On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Ken Widelitz wrote:

> If cheating is so rampant, and certain operators KNOW who is cheating, why 
> does no one EVER specify callsigns when stating cheating is rampant???
> 
> 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>