Don't the rules say something about both callsigns
being sent and received for it to be a valid QSO?
73s John W5TD
Packet hater #1
--- k4zw@adelphia.net wrote:
> 2. I'm not sure, but it seems to me that the DX
> stations are not IDing as
> frequently as they did before Packet.
>
> You got that right! In fact I was going to
> propose that unassisted stations be allowed a
> certain number of "Packet Chips" per contest. This
> would allow us to log onto the packet network "x"
> number of times during a contest for the sole
> purpose of obtaining a station's callsign. Some
> stations appear to be using packet in lieu of
> signing their call on a reasonable basis. Of course
> I'm not serious but any unassisted op who has
> experienced the following:
>
> DX Station - K4ZW 599 XX
> K4ZW - 599 5
> DX Station - TU
>
> for 3 - 10 straight QSO's while the multitudes call,
> know exactly what I mean.
>
> Happy Holidays!
> Ken K4ZW
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|