CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP SSB 160m

To: <ve3zi@rac.ca>, "Contest" <CQ-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP SSB 160m
From: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:14:57 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I agree, Roger. I wasn't in the contest, but I did
hand out some 160 QSOs near the end of the
NAQP. I made it a point not to call anyone who
was CQing below 1840 KHz.

73 Mike W4EF..................



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger Parsons" <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
To: "Contest" <CQ-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 7:36 AM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] NAQP SSB 160m


Some of you will know I am a contester, although
almost exclusively on CW. I am also a 160m DXer.

I was very disappointed last evening to hear many NAQP
stations operating on SSB at well below 1840kHz, and a
couple below 1830kHz. There is no need for this in a
purely domestic NA contest where we all have access to
the full 200kHz of the band. During several sweeps I
only detected two stations operating above 1900kHz,
and the centre of activity was clearly 1835-1870kHz.

Why?

I understand and accept that during major
international contests the whole of the band will be
used for SSB, but do feel that this contest could, and
should, be operated in accordance with the accepted
band plan.

73 Roger
VE3ZI




___________________________________________________________
Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. "The New Version is radically easier to use" - 
The Wall Street Journal
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>