That's just plain wrong. That would make remotely-operated stations
> second-class citizens.
>
> On 3/29/07, Tony Rogozinski < trogo@telegraphy.com> wrote:
> >
> > Simple idea - let the folks who want to operate remote from wherever and
> > however do their thing in a
> > "remote category" and the rest of us will continue to operate contests
> > as we've done for the past
> > 50 or 60 years. End of problem. Otherwise we're dealing with apples
> > and oranges IMHO and the
> > discussion will never end. I don't have a problem with remote
> > operation I just don't think those
> > folks who chose to or must do should be competing with those of us who
> > are doing it the old
> > fashioned way.
> >
> > Tony W4OI/HK1AR (I even still use a keyer to send my exchanges during
> > contests)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Gerry, W1VE/VE1RM
> Explore real-time competition in ham radio - post your score to
> http://www.getscores.org!
--
Gerry, W1VE/VE1RM
Explore real-time competition in ham radio - post your score to
http://www.getscores.org!
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|