CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RST as a sync [was: cut #]

To: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>,"CQ-CONTEST" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RST as a sync [was: cut #]
From: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 12:15:20 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> 
> From: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
> Date: 2007/06/01 Fri AM 07:52:06 CDT
> To: "CQ-CONTEST" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RST as a sync [was: cut #]
> 
> I'll make a bet that those that receive   579  OR 559 Log it as 5NN in their 
> logging software,  I know it is possible with most software to enter the 
> diff  RST  ,  It ain't gonna happen in the Logs of  MOST.  No Finger 
> pointing.

This is the beauty of TR's interface: you do not enter exchange data in 
individual fields, you simply enter the exchange in one field and the 
software figures it out. If you do not enter any RST, it assumes 599. If you 
enter an RST, it asserts that instead.

73, kelly
ve4xt
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>