CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic stations in CQWW

To: "'Richard DiDonna NN3W'" <nn3w@cox.net>,<cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic stations in CQWW
From: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 12:34:13 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Was a little different for me.

2006 - 45 USA (1.7%)
2007 - 75 USA  (2.0%)

I spent most of my running time on Saturday up around 14340.  On Sunday, I
was around 14177. Definitely got more USA callers up higher in the band.
Most guys seemed to be having fun and were being helpful in handing out
QSOs.  I will never complain about that!

Could be that the NN3 prefix was more exotic than my K5.  

I did have one guy call and ask if he could send me a QSL for my state.
Certainly!

I like that the CQ WPX contest gives 1 point for same country QSOs because
you have to work them to get the prefixes.  I am glad CQ WW emphasizes
working outside your country.  Yes, there is a bit of a conflict when a USA
caller covers up a DX station, but just like dupes, it is faster to work
them and move along.

Randy, K5ZD


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
> Richard DiDonna NN3W
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 2:17 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com; Mark Beckwith
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic stations in CQWW
> 
> USA percentage of all valid QSOs:
> 
> 2006 - 4.9 percent
> 2007 - 6.6 percent
> 
> On an absolute basis and relative basis, the numbers were up. 
>  Significantly on an absolute basis.
> 
> 73 RIch NN3W
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 6:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic stations in CQWW
> 
> 
> > Rich, what are the relative percentages of your total QSOs 
> for those years? 
> > Are you thinking the number is the result of specifying 
> "outside the US"? 
> > I'm not sure I get what you're trying to say.
> > 
> > Mark, N5OT
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
> > To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 11:47 AM
> > Subject: [CQ-Contest] Domestic stations in CQWW
> > 
> > 
> >> I'm not going to rehash old arguments and debates from the 
> past, but 
> >> WB9Z's 3830 posting did spark a little question...
> >>
> >> Did anyone else besides him and I notice a marked increase 
> in the number 
> >> of W/K stations answering domestic CQs this past weekend?  
> My stateside 
> >> QSO count went from 152 in 2006 to 231 in 2007.  And that 
> 231 number is 
> >> the result of the fact that around 1900z I changed my CQ 
> loop message to 
> >> "CQ countest outside of the United States?"
> >>
> >> Any other experiences on this matter?
> >>
> >> 73 Rich NN3W
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >>
> >> 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>