CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] MO2R ?

To: Paul@prohomeinspector.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] MO2R ?
From: "Alfred Frugoli" <alfred.frugoli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:02:50 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
My reading of Paul's message was different.  I read Multi Single, with the
main operating position having an 2R setup such that a single operator can
work 2 bands (run on 1, mults on the other).

I would think that this kind of setup would not be beneficial in a multi
operator category. Why burden a single op with finding mults on a 2nd rig
when s/he can concentrate on running rate, and a totally separate op can
concentrate on finding mults on another band (if allowed by the rules).
Besides, the band change rules and limitations on what the 2nd rig can be
used for in the Multi Single class would make the 2nd rig much less useful.

73 de Al, KE1FO

On Jan 23, 2008 10:39 AM, Professional Home Inspections <
Paul@prohomeinspector.net> wrote:

> Tom, this is a really GREAT synopsis of SO2R now how about MO2R? The same
> thing as SO2R but with multiple ops. Some contests state multi-op, but
> only
> 1 transmitter on the air at a time - thus MO2R. I have never seen a thread
> on this, but MO2R IS happening.
> It will be interesting to see the resulting thread of this query.
>
> Paul K2DB
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>