CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R the Lazy Man's Method

To: "'CQcontest Reflector'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R the Lazy Man's Method
From: "Jukka Klemola" <jukka.klemola@elisanet.fi>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:57:48 +0200
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
...
>SO1R the Lazy Man's Method
>
>A recent email call SO1R the lazy mans way of
>contesting.  Although I appreciate the
>conviction of such a statement, I started thinking about the comment.
I >find that SO1R is not the lazy mans way of
>contesting by any means.  In fact it may
>be even harder than that of SO2R even if the SO2R has to juggle right
brain >and left brain.
>
>An SO1R operator has to have all the abilities of an SO2R
>operator but has to think differently because the SO1R operator has to
make
>some crucial decisions to compete.
>
>For instance.
>What it the best band to start
>How long do I stay on the band 
>How to a balance rate versus multipliers
....
>Yes, I am looking at SO2R, not because I am torqued about the unfair
>disadvantage (I am not griping at all), but I am rather interested if I
>could run two radios at the same time.  I want to challenge myself...an
>SO1R op.  But, I am hardly a lazy SO1R op either.
>
>Lee - K0WA

Lee is clearly thinking how to utilise the station and himself as an
operator to the fullest extent in a balanced way to reach the maximum
score.

With one not-automated radio it really is more difficult to fully use
the operator's capabilities to make QSOs if the comparison is an
automated two radio system.

Epilogue:
I heard about it, 
I did not understand it, 
I read about it,
I wondered it,
I saw it,
I wanted it, 
I made infra for it, 
I did it 

and I liked it.


73,
Jukka OH6LI



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>