CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs - one more voice

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs - one more voice
From: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 00:17:37 +0100
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
KR2Q: It would appear (unknown to me factually) that the ARRL policy is an
attempt to short-circuit those QSL managers who can't resist sending out a
QSL for a "one-off" callsign, in an attempt to maintain their own program
integrity.

I am glad W9WNV asked for green bucks in 1960's and I quit QSL with YU1PCF
DXCC at 101.  QSL.cc and LotW recently.

However, now I can see an entirely different angle of QSL MANAGER reminding
me on banking adds on greatest return on investment.  I was only aware of
people using different callsigns in order to help friends DXCC standing.

I support open logs but I remember that long ago K1VR had some good legal
arguments against it.

73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>