To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs |
From: | kr2q@optimum.net |
Date: | Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:37:50 +0000 (GMT) |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Hooray! With this new "ruling," the focus is, in my opinion, now properly placed on the root cause, which is with some QSL manager's permitting "wiggle room" with callsign mismatches. Long Live Open Logs!! de Doug KR2Q (just slightly biased) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs, Pete Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 1942 aircraft radio question, Russell Hill |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step?, N7mal |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs, Dave/KA1NCN |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |