I think you misread my post. I support the disclosure of logs. And am pleased
the CQWW committee has resisted the undertoned efforts of the ARRL to squelch
the opening of logs through the auspices of the DXCC program.
73 Rich NN3W
----- Original Message -----
From: Gerry Hull
To: Richard DiDonna NN3W
Cc: CQ-Contest
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step?
Richard, Hans, etc....
First of all, you do not keep your log private. If you kept it private, you
would not submit it to the contest committee, you'd simply keep it to yourself,
and claim victory among your friends. ARRL and CQ, or any other contest
committee, has the right to determine if a log is to be public or private.
As has been stated on this reflector, and is clear from the rules, once ARRL or
CQ has the log, it becomes property of the respective organization, and they
can do with it as they wish. From the ARRL prospective, I'm sure the CAC will
make a future decision about publishing based on rational input.
In the contest world of 2008, these arguments are academic -- CQ has published
the CQWW logs for the past couple of years, and I'm sure, will continue to do
so. It has just been just pointed out on this reflector that publishing the
logs has helped the committee in resolving some pesky issues. So, there are
MANY good reasons for publishing the logs.
I just don't buy the "this is the way it's always been done" argument. In my
opinion, there are more benefits the contest community at large from open logs
than from protecting an individuals rights to the log information. Of course,
you guys are free to offer a dissenting opinion.
I presume all this fuss and reflector traffic is de to lack of propagation on
the radio, so we all have a lot of time to blather on email.
73, Gerry W1VE
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net> wrote:
Oh, so since the the technology for QSO analysis, skimmer, and spot analysis
is readily available, there are no secrets and the argument re: "I keep my
log prviate so as to not alert the competition" is now void . Hence, no
reason to keep the logs private.
You've proven our point for us. Thanks OM!
73 Rich NN3W
----- Original Message -----
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
To: "K1AR John" <K1AR@aol.com>; "CQ-Contest" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step?
> Note to K1AR:
>
> See below. I rest my case.
>
> 73, Hans, K0HB
>
>>
>> I already have a software strategy tool which plots the QSO rate and
>> Mult rate, per band and multi-band, for stations on the CQWW log site
>> (and any other cabrillo file I import). Mix that with the live feed
>> from your existing contest software, and you add another dimension to
>> the world of contesting - making live strategy decisions based on past
>> performance.
>>
>
>> 73, Gerry W1V
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|