| To: | john@kk9a.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Log Checking |
| From: | charlie carroll <k1xx@cfl.rr.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:32:14 -0400 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
John: I saw the same thing in the V26X log with lots of removed Qs. Some calls were new and others not so new, but many did show in the FCC database. With the short time that I looked at the results, I didn't see any kind of pattern that might explain why they decided to cut so many Qs that seemed to be good. 73 charlie, k1xx/v26x _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Reflections on comments about open logs, K0HB |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step?, Eric Hilding |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Log Checking, john |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |