Something just does not add up for me. Please note that these postings were
made back in July 30, 2008....waaaay before the CQWWDX contests.
KY1V discusses OPEN LOGS
http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00284.html
W1VE references CQWW having open logs; "the cats out of the bag"
http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00299.html
Ken Harker replies lauding OPEN LOGS as a step towards "fair log adjudication."
No mention of EXPOSURE OF CHEATING as a motivation.
http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00309.html
Certainly, it is now and has been well known that CQWW has OPEN LOGS....well,
assuming that you read the CQWW Rules prior to entry or read the CQ-Contest
reflector.
Now here is the issue for me.....
If someone wants to protest, fine! Boston Tea Party and all that.....
BUT...how come 6Y1V submitted a log for CQWW 2008 SSB?
See it yourself at http://www.cqww.com/logs-received_ssb.htm
Be sure to scroll down ONE page to get to the 6Y range.
What happened between SSB and CW? I always love a good mystery, but I
would genuinely like to know!!
de Doug KR2Q
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|