I'm still hoping that one of the guys who was involved will tell us
how the Skimmer number was arrived at, and particularly what
validation level was used. With 3 KHz of audio from a typical audio
tape, Skimmer would "hear" much the same muddle as a human. If a
second signal appears on exactly (or close to) the same frequency, it
gets as confused as we do. But in any case, nobody is suggesting
that a human mind can do what a properly implemented Skimmer can do,
even in a 3 KHz bandwidth.
73, Pete N4ZR
At 04:59 PM 5/27/2009, Michael Tope wrote:
>Doesn't skimmer implement more than one demodulator (i.e it can
>demodulate multiple code streams simultaneously provided that there is
>enough frequency offset between the streams to allow for filtering) ? An
>interesting comparison would be to add up the total number of unique
>calls copied by all the human operators (i.e. the gang of human
>demodulators) and then compare that with Skimmer (i.e. the gang of
>robotic demodulators).
>
>73, Mike W4EF......
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|