| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com, Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Statio inspections |
| From: | Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:02:52 -0700 (PDT) |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> Might one consider the opposite > possibility -- that the inspections are intended to prove > that most of the winners are NOT cheating? > One might, but that might kill off all the innuendo, rampant speculation, conspiracy theories, baiting, witch hunts, fall of the holy contesting empire and other topics of conversation so popular yesterday, today and most likely tomorrow. ;o) 73, Julius n2wn _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections->Hijacked Thread, Doug Renwick |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections, Tom Haavisto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Statio inspections, Doug Smith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Statio inspections, Rex Maner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |