This sounds like a great opportunity for DX stations to know that 14.300.0
will be a clear spot when NA is open...I fully support the petition... :-)
tongue in cheek....cu all on 14.300.00 in the next contest..
VK4TI
Richard F DiDonna NN3W wrote:
>
> Remember, this is not a petition to the FCC. This seems like an open
> ended
> petition directed at contest sponsors (e.g., the ARRL and CQ).
>
> Mind you, that the petition would eventually like to influence national
> level clubs - i.e., DARC, RSGB, RAC, ARRL, etc.
>
> There is where the real problem is - as was aptly demonstrated this past
> summer involving the WAE contests..
>
> 73 Rich NN3W
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
> To: "'David Kopacz'" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>;
> <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 7:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN
>
>
>> Here's the funny thing.
>>
>> Let's suppose the FCC gives the MMSN guys what they want.
>>
>> What's to stop contesters outside of FCC jurisdiction from operating just
>> as
>> they do now, including operating near or on the MMSN frequency? Nothing.
>>
>> On that basis alone, the FCC should reject the petition as unrealistic.
>>
>> 73, ron w3wn
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/anti-contest-petition-MMSN-tp4105824p4111598.html
Sent from the CQ Contesting (Nabble) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|