CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Sprint/FOC/RTTY

To: n2ic@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Sprint/FOC/RTTY
From: Rick Tavan N6XI <rtavan@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 19:36:24 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Thanks for the Sprint Qs, Steve. Sorry I missed you in the Marathon.

I think the intent was to avoid the bigger conflict with WPX RTTY. That
contest has far more participants than the Marathon. Although CW Sprint
could interfere with a serious Marathon effort, I noticed little Sprint
activity below 025, leaving some decent space for the Marathon. And except
for 40M, I had very little interference from the XE RTTY event up higher in
the bands. Although my own operating time for the Marathon was limited, I
think I could have put in a decent Marathon effort plus a full four hour
Sprint with minimal interference. For me, the Marathon is most enjoyable in
brief spurts. If one puts in too many hours, the rate gets really slow.
Frankly, I thought the three contests coexisted pretty well.

/Rick N6XI

On 2/6/10, Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> To my great disappointment, the February CW Sprint has been scheduled for
> the
> same weekend as the FOC marathon and (yet another everyone-works-everyone)
> RTTY
> contest.
>
> For the past several years, this conflict has been avoided by swapping the
> Phone
> Sprint and CW Sprint weekends in February. This was a very good move !
>
> Could someone explain the reasoning and process that lead to the Phone and
> CW
> Sprint weekends being swapped back again, leading to this conflict ?
>
>
-- 

Rick Tavan N6XI
Truckee, CA
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>