2, 44, 144, 1044, this sequence does look like progress is being made.
Time to call out the lawyers :)
73 de Prasad VU2PTT, W2PTT
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is what the rules say:
>
> Exchange: RS(T) report plus a progressive contact serial number
> starting with 001 for the first contact
>
> A progressive serial number. Is that the same as a sequential number, or
> not?
>
> Ryan, N2RJ
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, N7DF <n7df@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > I have noticed that there is no requirement in the WPX rules for serial
> numbers to be sequential, only that they begin with 001
> >
> > Reminds me of the school kids chant "one two skip a few, forty four, skip
> some more"
> >
> > Nothing against foxing out the competition by skipping ahead occasionally
> to give numbers larger than them.
> >
> > N7DF
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ryan A. Jairam,
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|