AB7E said to himself:
> I always love reading this report, and I'm curious what kind of result
> it has. I'm sure it goes a long way toward encouraging good behavior
> among those who know it exists, but I wonder if the contest sponsors
> actually use it. I don't expect any of the contests sponsors to
> publicly comment, but has anyone ever looked at various contests to see
> if there is a difference between submitted logs and the official final
> results for the obvious offenders noted in the associated K1TTT report?
> It would certainly be a remarkable shame if Dave's well-documented list
> merely provided amusement for the rest of us.
>
Sadly, it doesn't seem to be having an impact on dodgy spotting around
here. What is perhaps one of the most-often-mentioned dodgy spotters in
the reports is from around here & he's still at it, although lately he's
been changing tactics. The other dodgy spotting going on in these parts
is either below K1TTT's threshold for mentioning, or (understandably)
without local knowledge nobody understands they look to be dodgy.
When I look at the reports, I see an issue that doesn't really matter to
NA & wonder, would things be different if Ws were into this dodgy
spotting thing? Maybe it wouldn't be so amusing if it happens over
there, like by somebody in your state or call area - let alone just
across town.
And that, I would suggest, is why AB7E was talking to himself with that
post.
Another thing for y'all to ignore: a case where it can be seen that
something had been done about what looked to have been dodgy spotting.
73, ex-VR2BG/p.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|