CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU 2009 and 2010 and ????

To: vk4ti@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU 2009 and 2010 and ????
From: Ricardo Navarrete <ricardoea4zk@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:54:44 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It's embarrasing how ARRL answered that way to a demand of a HQ, I don't
know why, but it is clear that DL HQ made some tricks logging callsings ...
But this is the way they do things, I'm of course going retire my
subscription from ARRL.....

73's


2010/6/9 <vk4ti@yahoo.com>

> Changing points like this can be very good or very bad...
> What if your own zone and country are Zero points and NO MULTIPLIER
> allocated for own Zone...??
> Would this affect every competitor evenly ?
> >From A VK perspective this would affect us on LF; as at best we make very
> few contacts and being able to work the small VK contest population gives us
> some points but is this better for the overall contest...
> I would hope respondents think in terms of the contest and not how it
> affects them..
>
> --- On Thu, 10/6/10, LY8O <ly8o@ot.lt> wrote:
>
> From: LY8O <ly8o@ot.lt>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] IARU 2009 and 2010 and ????
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Received: Thursday, 10 June, 2010, 2:17 AM
>
> Hello,
>
> After all circus with few HQ station results in the last IARU contest the
> last information about HQ category in 2010 sounds destructive and have no
> future. For me, as a LY0HQ team member, and for many other amateurs who
> preparing to participate in the HQ teams around the World I believe the
> words below sounds like a monkey business or like a simple disabling from CC
> side:
> "Effective with the 2010 IARU HF World Championship, no adjudication
> of HQ station logs will be conducted by the ARRL," wrote Patton. (NN1N)
> I can't believe this is all the CC could do... In this case I see a reason
> to exclude HQ category at all because I thing number or participators will
> decrease very noticeably - many will decide to participate in SO or M/S
> categories.
> On the other hand there is a possibility to reduce own country supporters
> weight in the final results - just to change points per QSO weigth. If we
> lets say will go to the scoring 1 point for own country, 2 points for a
> different zone in the own country, 3 points for different country in the
> same zone, 5 points for a different zone in the same continent and 10 points
> for a different continent (or something else) - the final picture will be
> different. Perhaps there could be and other solutions as well.
> So I think CC must to decide very clear - to exclude HQ category at all or
> let to compete HQ stations with each other because this i a contest but with
> rules changes.
> Thanks for reading.
>
> 73, Remi LY8O
> member of LY0HQ team
> The only real QSL manager of LY0HQ since 1996.
>  _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
EA4ZK Ricardo Navarrete
ricardoea4zk@gmail.com
Tnx es cul , 73 gd DX
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>