CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] no no no...it MUST be 579 (was 599)

To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] no no no...it MUST be 579 (was 599)
From: Henk Remijn PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:31:46 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
  I am so happy that I only speak Dutch. Rules are in English. So NO 
rules for me.

73 Henk PA5KT

Op 23-07-2010 0:28, kr2q@optimum.net schreef:
> Sorry folks...but ever try reading the RULES?
>
> > From CQWW
>
> IV. NUMBER EXCHANGE: Phone: RS
> report plus zone (i.e., 5705). CW: RST
> report plus zone (i.e., 57905).
>
> So we are all REQUIRED to send 5705 or 57905, irrespective of S strength, 
> readability, or
> actual zone.
>
> We all know that "IE" translates into "that is," right?  So CQ specifies 
> exactly what we
> are supposed to send and it is NOT 599.
>
> NOTE:  Clearly, the rule should read: (EG 5705) since EG = "for example."
>
> Additionally, nowhere in the CQWW Rules does it state that you have record 
> the exchange,
> only to make an exchange.
>
> As far as I know (afaik for you net guys), cabrillo is what "requires" that 
> the exchange field
> be populated.
>
> April in July!!
>
> de Doug KR2Q
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


-- 
Henk Remijn PA5KT
email: pa5kt@remijn.net
www: www.pa5kt.com

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>