CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest] 2009 CQWW CW participation figures and logs acc

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest] 2009 CQWW CW participation figures and logs accuracy
From: "Robert L. Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 10:33:43 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Stan,

Very interesting information and thank you for providing it!

I think that a few of the numbers are incorrect though -
the Qso's in Log calls in the columns
More than 10+ through 90+ stations

The qso's in Log for 90+ should be greater than 100+
80 + should be greater than 90+ and so on.

As the total number of q's goes down, the number
of stations making that minimum of q's (appearing
in the logs of others) has to go up, with the More than 10
category should have the highest number than any other column

73
Bob KQ2M

kq2m@earthlink.net

www.rlsfinancialgroup.com





_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest] 2009 CQWW CW participation figures and logs accuracy, Robert L. Shohet <=