CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question

from [al_lorona] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question
From: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:20:03 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> 
Do the guys who object to the arbitrary selection of a check year in the SS 
exchange also object to the universal practice of arbitrarily sending '599' 
instead of a *real* signal report? 

Al  W6LX


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callsigns in echanges, Radio K0HB
Next by Date:  Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callsigns in echanges, Paul O'Kane
Previous by Thread:  Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question, Joe
Next by Thread:  Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question, John Geiger
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]