True Steve, but the August test is a very different animal from the January
test.
>From January CW...One thing is clear. You cannot win NAQP from east of the
Mississippi in January...
2011 (claimed):
KL9A
N5KO/6
N6MJ
2010:
KL9A
N5KO/6
N6MJ
2009:
KL9A
N6MJ
N5KO/6
2008:
N6MJ
N6RO
N9RV/7
2007:
N2NL/6
KL9A
N2IC/5
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve London" <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP
> On 01/12/2011 07:05 AM, K1TTT wrote:
>> But, but, but, that would change the whole nature of the contest. that
>> would
>> cause all the old records to be obsolete. that would change strategies.
>> That might force some people to turn their antennas a bit. That might
>> change the perennial winners a bit. that might make it more interesting.
>
> Perennial winners ?
>
> Look at the top-5 in the August CW NAQP, that was just published in the
> January/February NCJ. Compare that to the high-claimed scores in last
> weekends'
> NAQP. A very different list ! This is what makes the NAQP a great contest.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|