CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE: Chea

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE: Cheating and bad journalism
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:28:38 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
That seems rather silly and convoluted to me.  The whole concept of 
assisted vs unassisted is based upon whether a single operator performed 
all operating tasks (finding the station, copying the information, etc) 
or not.  The issue of tools is an entirely different matter.

Dave   AB7E




On 9/22/2011 8:16 AM, Collins, Graham wrote:
>
>
> Seems to me that ASSISTED or NOT-ASSISTED is splitting hairs - some choose to 
> use a tool and others not, much the same as some choose to log on a computer 
> and others on paper. Perhaps there needs to be categories for "COMPUTER 
> LOGGED" and another for "PAPER LOGGED"; after all, those that choose to log 
> on a computer have an unfair advantage over those that choose to log on paper.
>
>
> Cheers, Graham ve3gtc
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>