CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE: Chea

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE: Chea
From: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:54:26 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
EI5DI wrote: To this I say that anyone who needs a CW decoder has no 
business being in a CW contest - because they don't know CW.

I don't know Baudot code so I used PC decoder this fabulous CQ WW RTTY 
weekend.  I built DH1TW type SDR IF adapter in my FT-1000MP in order to 
"see" 20 kHz bandwidth.  I also wrote my own program to decode all RTTY 
callsigns within BUT if I use it, I am "assisted".  By whom?

I feel digitally "restricted" without Extreme class :-(  This is NOT good 
for the best scientific hobby of 21st century as advertised by IARU.

73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>