Re: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS exchange

[Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>]

On 07/11/2011 16:58, Georgek5kg@aol.com wrote:

> Question: Should there be a penalty for not sending the callsign as part of
>   the required exchange?

Yes, just as there should be a penalty (on ARRL) for not
including the callsign as a Cabrillo exchange element,
between the precedence and the check.

Why encourage redundancy in contest exchanges?  I accept
that I may not fully understand the rich history of SS.

73,
Paul EI5DI




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest