CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS exchange

To: <CQ-Contest@CONTESTING.COM>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS exchange
From: "Robert Brandon" <rb@austin.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 13:15:52 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'll offer a possible explanation . . .

I did a very quick setup of N1MM at my home station to make a few Qs on
Sunday afternoon.  I kept getting people asking for my check.  After a few
more QSOs, I realized that my callsign wasn't being sent.  (I just used the
default setup with just {Exch} in memory.)  

Robert K5PI

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Georgek5kg@aol.com
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 10:58 AM
To: CQ-Contest@CONTESTING.COM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS exchange

I am throwing this out there for comment.
 
In SS, I worked a number of ops who did not send their callsign  as part of 
the exchange.  I found this to be very frustrating  for several reasons, 
namely (1) sending the callsign as part of the  "required exchange" is 
specified in the SS rules, (2) it breaks  the rhythm when copying the
exchange, and 
finally (3) it gives the op an  advantage by not taking time to send his 
callsign.
 
Question: Should there be a penalty for not sending the callsign as part of 
 the required exchange?  
 
73, George, K5KG
 
George  Wagner, K5KG
Sarasota, FL 
941-400-1960  cell
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>