Frankly, I found it much more common for people CQing at any moderate
speed to be unable actually to handle information at that speed, so I
tended to slow down *at least* to the CQing station's speed. My guess
is that the people who didn't were simply being careless.
73, Pete N4ZR
The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at
reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000 AND now
at arcluster.reversebeacon.net port 7000
On 11/9/2011 10:03 AM, Bill wrote:
> According to Skimmer, I was CQing at an average speed of 25 WPM during
> Sweepstakes. Most callers answered at or near my calling speed. But, a
> not insignificant subset responded nearer 35 WPM, including when giving
> their exchange. It seems like some callers assume that if you're running
> at 25 WPM you can copy faster than that. I suspect, in general, that may
> very well be true, but maybe I'm just projecting. And for whatever it's
> worth, I was not using my own call sign, but that of another amateur who
> probably never sends north of 18-20 WPM.
>
> 73,
>
> Bill/NG3K
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|