CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Is QSL Bureau pertinent in today HAM Radio

To: "'Yannick \(XV4Y\)'" <yannick.devos@online.fr>, <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Is QSL Bureau pertinent in today HAM Radio
From: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:41:01 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The results sure seem to be one sided...QSL bureaus are still very valuable.
QSLing direct has gotten ridiculously expensive! I use the bureau almost
every month.

Bill W5VX

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Yannick (XV4Y)
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 9:39 PM
To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Is QSL Bureau pertinent in today HAM Radio

Hi,

This is bit out of topic but contesters opinion is highly valuable.
Following a discussion on DX-World.net about the next Intrepid-DX group QSL
policy I started a small poll about QSL in the 21th century in general.
Please share your opinion.
http://www.qslwatch.com/poll-about-qsl-bureau/

Thanks.
73,
Yan.
---
Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y
http://xv4y.radioclub.asia/
http://varc.radioclub.asia/
http://www.qslwatch.com/

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>