Hi Willy - I think you're over-analyzing Randy's message, though I
acknowledge that I don't know the answers to "Why now?" and "Why this
way?" For the past 35 years, Bob has been pretty much the face and
voice of CQWW, and very much the decision-maker. So of course, it is
"the end of an era," even if the new guy keeps on pretty much the same
track. It *is* puzzling that his departure was announced before a
successor had been identified, but it may not be an easy job to fill.
Bob, himself, has been an agent of change in CQWW the last few years.
The relatively recent decision to open all logs, for example, is
diametrically opposite the position he took a decade ago when I
suggested an agreement between CQ and the ARRL to grant DXCC credit for
verified CQWW QSOs. At that time, he told me that he would never
approve the release of a single line from any CQWW log. Fortunately,
times have changed.
I do hope that the new CQWW management takes a more transparent approach
to the administration of the contest. I'm not suggesting that measures
taken to reduce cheating should be applied in public, or even that
positions taken by individual members of the Contest Committee on
various issues should be made public. I do feel that it would be
helpful to credibility if the members of the Committee were publicly
identified. I think that the contesting community would be impressed by
their experience and accomplishments, and that its decisions would gain
weight simply by letting us know who was involved.
73, Pete N4ZR
The World Contest Station Database, at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at
reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000 and
arcluster.reversebeacon.net, port 7000
On 9/6/2012 11:25 AM, Vladimir Umanets wrote:
The question is why he left so suddenly?
73s
Braco
E77DX /OE1EMS
It is one of the questions Braco. One other question I have about Bob's
retirement is why not one single CQWW CC member says something about it?
It looks more like a special forces operation rather than a normal change of
directors of the biggest amateur radio contests in the world. Why? Is everything
that bad in our hobby? Why Randy called it "the end of era"? What era Randy are
you talking about? Does that mean the new director will implement totaly new
policy and approaches? I like the way CQWW has been developing into what it is
now.
I hope it will continue developing like before.
As to me Bob has deserved a Big thank you from us all contesters to say the
least.
May be at some critical points Bob didn't act accordingly, but we all make
mistakes,
even the Kings. TNX Bob for all your efforts you've put into making CQWW what
it is now!
73's & GL, Willy UA9BA
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|