CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] another example

To: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] another example
From: Rick Dougherty <rick@nq4i.com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 20:50:43 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Hank..your comments are only true for a single op or M-S...if you are
M-M or even M-2 you spend time on the band and work everything you
hear...there really is no strategy in M-M.

de Rick


On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net> wrote:

> Any and all after-the-contest change-QSO-point-value comparisons are of
> questionable value. If point values had been different, stations would used
> different strategies.
>
> Contest Exuberantly,
>
> Hank, W6SX
>
> Mammoth Lakes, California
>
> Elevation 8083 feet in John Muir's Range of Light
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>