CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contesting - A Summary

To: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>,cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contesting - A Summary
From: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:17:27 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
At 14:39 2013-06-25 , Paul O'Kane wrote:
>Here's my summary.
>
>If what you're doing can't be done without an
>engine, then what you're doing can't be sailing,
>or gliding or cycling.
>
>If you can't have a QSO without the internet,
>then it's not a ham-radio QSO.
>
>On the internet, distance has no significance -
>there is no DX.
>
>Or did I get all these wrong?
>
>
>73,
>Paul EI5DI


No Paul, you did not get all these wrong. 

The problem is that the majority of those debating the matter are unable to
grasp the full perspective of what remote control will do to ham radio
contesting.

73,
Peter SM2CEW 


 



 


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>