CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] IDing

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] IDing
From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to: n2ic@arrl.net
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:27:28 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 02/03/2014 01:49 PM, Ken Widelitz wrote:
who think it is discourteous not to ID after every
QSO:


You missed Bob's point entirely. The idea is to have callers in the pileup
wait as short a time as possible to work you.

You have ignored the time wasted by those who are listening, and silently waiting for you to sign your call. We don't want to add to the mayhem when, on Sunday afternoon, there is a good chance you are a dupe. We also don't appreciate you wasting our time for alleged benefit of reducing the waiting time of those who are calling.

As to your own behavior, you are right - I never recall having to wait long for you to ID. However, I can name others who have gone 10-15-20 QSO's without an ID in CQWW.

73,
Steve, N2IC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>