CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

To: "Scott" <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Igor Sokolov <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 03:30:15 +0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Scott,
It is never ending story. In responce to these IDers the rule will be modified saying that the speed of the IDer should not be more then 20WPM :)

73, Igor UA9CDC

----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott" <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 3:00 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened


I think I just found a new business--selling automatic Iders to contesters!

Remember the ones we constructed to connect to 2m rigs back when repeaters were still not that common? The CW version would send the ID out at, Oh, 50-60wpm so not to take up time. The voice one, for the purists or if they pass a rule saying you have to ID in voice for the SSB contests could also be speeded up. They would be better than the DVRs now in use because they could track the number of times the rig was keyed and ID according to the particular contest. The ardunio homebrew version could be published in NCJ and/or CQ. It would have the side benefit of use for holding the freq just as the big guns do now with DVR (which nobody has argued is unethical though we all know it is done!).

If you think this is just a "rant", wait until they start to come out in response to this rule

73,
Scott. AA0AA





Sent from Scott's iPad

On Feb 3, 2014, at 2:08 PM, "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com> wrote:

Or... you may choose assisted cathegory in WPX :)

73, Igor UA9CDC

----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale Putnam" <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened


OR.. as a little pistol, and knowing full well that my point to him is as valuable as it willbe.. I may elect to let him find me, later, when he climbs down off his high horse and actually starts working people instead of working calls. And when it gets to cq dupe.. maybe he can find me.. and maybe not.. in either case,the Qs I make, not waiting for him are worth a whole lot more than the time spent waiting.And some of the others feel that they can always.. not matter what.. find all the mults they need,that maybe true.. but I won't be able to find all the Qs that I can make sitting around waiting for someoneto take all that precious time to id...

Have a great day,


--...   ...--
Dale - WC7S in Wy




This is reasonable to me. As a really little pistol most of the time, I'm
not going to get through on the first call if the guy has that big of a
pileup. If I'm going to spend a few minutes calling him to get a QSO, I may
as well wait for him to ID and then start calling if he's not a dupe.
info/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>