This is reasonable to me. As a really little pistol most of the time, I'm
not going to get through on the first call if the guy has that big of a
pileup. If I'm going to spend a few minutes calling him to get a QSO, I may
as well wait for him to ID and then start calling if he's not a dupe.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:15 AM, <john@kk9a.com> wrote:
> If this needs to be in the rules, IDing at least once a minute seems
> reasonable. The good ops will continue to ID more frequently as the
> pileup conditions allow and the bad ones will just have to not use QRZ as
> their callsign once a minute.
>
> John KK9A / P40A
>
>
> To: "'Bob Shohet, KQ2M'" <kq2m@kq2m.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com
> >
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
> From: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
> Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 13:56:58 -0800
>
> Hi Bob,
>
>
>
> Agree entirely. You hit the nail on the head. The idea is to ID only
> frequently enough to keep the pileup to just a few callers. Requiring ID's
> is a good idea, but it is a time issue, not a number of QSOs issue. A once
> a
> minute rule works for me.
>
>
>
> 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|