Tor, I agree that this is a typical assumption. Is there data to show
otherwise? All the comments that I see blend seamlessly in and out of dialog
of things on band maps, RBN, and SDR.
There is no specific reason that the 2 have to be blended - but in almost all
cases - it would seem - they are.
Somehow, the Panadapter slipped though the unassisted cracks. I don't agree
with it, but that ship has sailed.
Ed N1UR
-----Original Message-----
From: RT Clay [mailto:rt_clay@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 6:00 PM
To: 'Stu Phillips'; cq-contest@contesting.com; Edward Sawyer
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SDR's have knobs too!
"when the callsigns and signal strength are all there available"
This is a typical assumption among the anti-SDR crowd: SDR users only operate
assisted. This is not always the case!
Why not use your eyes in addition to ears to find signals? BTW you can see
things like chirp on a SDR panadapter :)
Tor
N4OGW
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 5/9/14, Edward Sawyer <SawyerEd@Earthlink.net> wrote:
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SDR's have knobs too!
To: "'Stu Phillips'" <stu@k6tu.net>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Date: Friday, May 9, 2014, 3:13 PM
Why bother turning the knob when the
callsigns and signal strength are all
there available for you in point and click fashion - or worse - in automated
harvest and log and somehow think its still fun mode.
The "magic of radio" is in the discovery process - in my book. Its much
like the difference of a road trip across country with GPS and automated info
about the area vs discovering the road as you go.
The problem often occurs when you don't let yourself "discover" - you think
you found everything because you found everything you were looking for. But
you will rarely find what you weren't looking for - unless you give yourself
the freedom to "discover".
If you have never waited around for the half chirpy CW signal with Polar
flutter on 20M CW to sign as HS0XXX or the interesting accent near the noise
floor on 15M SSB at 04Z to sign 3D2XX, you have not really experienced DXing
or Contesting in my book. And it’s a shame that people have lost that
enjoyment out a well intended - but misguided (in my
opinion) effort to look
for efficiency over all else.
73
Ed N1UR
-----Original Message-----
From: Stu Phillips [mailto:stu@k6tu.net]
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 1:30 PM
To: Edward Sawyer; cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: SDR's have knobs too!
Ed,
Software Defined Radios have knobs - and if you want, more than one!
So let¹s debunk this myth once and for all:
1. Software Defined Radios can and do have knobs 2. Don¹t let knob-itism get
in the way of appreciating the better capabilities
offered by software defined radios.
I respect folks who like their knob based radios - and indeed, I use knobs
with my SDR based station and wouldn¹t be without it.
But I would never go back to a non-SDR radio - the experience and the
advantages are simply too compelling.
Stu K6TU
On 5/9/14, 9:49 AM, "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@Earthlink.net>
wrote:
>There might be an app for sex too - but that doesn't mean its better or
>>more enjoyable than the real thing.
>
>
>
>A lot of us like turning the big knob. And as SO2R ops know - 2 big >knobs
>are better than 1 big knob ;-).
>
>
>
>Just because its possible - doesn't make it better.
>
>
>
>Ed N1UR
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|