CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB

To: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>, <k5zd@charter.net>, "'CQ-Contest'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>, "Editor W2VU" <w2vu@cq-amateur-radio.com>, "Publisher K2RED" <cq@cq-amateur-radio.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB
From: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Igor Sokolov <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 01:40:59 +0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hans, thank you.
You got it absolutely right. Why should a boy who only loves radio and contesting, why should he be penalized for whatever political games happen around him. Why CQ magazine deprives this boy from from participation in the contest CQ mag sponsors? Is that the purpose of this contest and ham radio in general to divide people into first and second grade based on the governments these people live under? Why ARRL found may be temporary but wise solution to the problem but CQ magazine decided that they know better and did it in their own way? Do they understand that they do harm not only to their sponsored contest but to ham radio in general?

73, Igor UA9CDC

(W2VU and K2RED added to the conversation on the advice of K5ZD)

Here's the long and short of it from my viewpoint.

A certain boy in a certain place has a hobby radio station. He wishes to participate in radiosport contests run by hobbyist magazines in another place.

His license conditions including how he must identify his station are dictated by whatever government has authority over that place at any given time.

Other governments, rightly or wrongly, might dispute that authority, but the boy in that place is not subject to the authority of those other countries.

Now those hobby magazines have decided that the politicians (in their country) shall be the ultimate authority whether the boy and his radio (in another country) are eligible to play in their contest.

Methinks the hobby magazines are taking themselves far too seriously, and in an international hobby have cloaked themselves in misplaced provincial patriotism.

dit dit

73, de Hans, K0HB
--
"Just a boy and his radio"™
--
Proud Member of:
. A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op
. Minnesota Wireless contesters - http://www.W0AA.org
. Arizona Outlaws contesters - http://www.arizonaoutlaws.net
. Twin City DX Assn - http://www.tcdxa.org
. Minnesota Amateur Radio Technical Society - http://www.mn-arts.org/
. Lake Vermilion DX Assn - http://www.lvdxa.org
. Royal Naval Amateur Radio Society - http://www.rnars.org.uk/
. SOC - http://www.qsl.net/soc
. CW Operators Club – http://www.cwops.org
. SKCC - http://www.skccgroup.com/
--



-----Original Message----- From: Randy Thompson K5ZD
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2014 1:23 PM
To: 'Andy Kazantsev' ; 'CQ-Contest'
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB

The CQ WW Contest Committee was very divided on this issue. The Editor and
Publisher of CQ Magazine have made this policy decision. Any comments or
appeals should be directed to CQ.

Randy, K5ZD


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>