Ward,
Thanks for your always very well thought out, reasonable and consistently
entertaining emails. It brings a smile to my face quite honestly, to see an
email from you in my inbox (even if I am hassling you for something- OK, we
won’t go there_)
I just replied to Dave K1ZZ and apologized for my blunder calling the NCJ QSO
Parties and Sprints “ARRL Sponsored”…correctly they are ARRL published but not
sponsored. My bad. I probably should’ve realized that, but all this MAR
business has me slightly on the defensive. (hi). I am taking a beating by a
small select few who seem to think I am asking for special treatment. Indeed,
all we are asking for is to be treated EQUALLY.
If Rhode Island, Maine and Mass shared a section I would never dream of even
ASKING for a change. I don’t belive in special treatment.
I just ask for our actual real provinces to be treated like every other ARRL
section for the purposes of Sweepstakes and a select few other contests.
Most contests (and ARRL contests) are on board. Every State in the Union has at
least one section for Sweeps, (and many have various sections) and yet we
continue to be lumped together – why ?
Although I certainly cannot speak for all contesters here in these
heretotherfore metioned netheregions, I think the general sentiment here in
MAR…err, NB, NS and PEI is to leave all the current “sections” as they are, but
to forget they ever heard the term MAR and just make it NB, NS and PEI. We
don’t have a problem with VE3 having 4 sections or California having however
many it is that they have.
The stickler is that no other current States/Provinces have been lumped
together to create a section. New sections keep appearing every so often
(wasn’t WCF not too long ago and then the 4 VE3 sections), yet all us MCCers
continue to be “one section” even though the club itself is 30 strong and there
are many out here that are not in MCC. We can definitely hold our own. VY2ZM,
VE9HF, VE1OP, VE1RGB, VE1ZA, VY2LI, VE9ML, myself , small pistol VE9AA and
many to name only a few. I am sure all those calls are quite familiar to those
reading this.
ND, VY0/VE8 or EB are sections with less representations by a long shot.
Your list looks perfect to me.
Who do I send a quarter to so a phone call can take place between W1 and VE4 to
even consider our most humble and long overdue request?
Mike VE9AA
Mike, Coreen & Corey
Keswick Ridge, NB
From: Ward Silver [mailto:hwardsil@gmail.com]
Sent: October 30, 2014 7:27 PM
To: Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA; 'Cary Rubenfeld'; 'Ed Richardson';
fdavis@nfld.net; garybartlett@accesswave.ca; k5zd@cqww.com; kx9x@arrl.org;
k1ar@contesting.com
Cc: 'Bill Lester'; 'JP LeBlanc'; n2ic@arrl.net; Richard Ferch;
ve1dt@infinichron.com; 'Peter Csanky'; 'Phil Irons'; 'Rick VE9HF Williams';
ve1js@ns.sympatico.ca; Ve4baw@rac.ca; 'Rick Williams'
Subject: Re: FW: [CQ-Contest] Move to disband MAR section in Canada (for
contesting)
Hi Mike,
Point of order - the ARRL does not sponsor any of the NCJ contests. The ARRL
publishes NCJ but it is a relatively independent entity (not a DXCC entity) and
makes its own rules.
I looked at the NCJ Sprint rules (http://ncjweb.com/Sprint-Rules.pdf) and
multipliers for Canada are first described in Scoring Rule 10 as "provinces"
but the multiplier list then proceeds to combine all five of the Maritime
prefixes (VE1/9/VY2/VO1/VO2) into a group which is really a section. Perhaps
that can be fixed - I'll drop the editors a note.
As to the ARRL contests, there are only two that use the MAR section as a
multiplier (Sweepstakes and 160 Meters) based on RAC sections. Field Day does,
as well, but "it's not a contest" :-) All remaining ARRL contests use
provinces more or less correctly. True that the ARRL does not have a
consistent policy across contests for counting Canadian multipliers but it is
pretty consistent in applying a specific contest's rules.
If the rules of Sweepstakes were changed to count Canadian provinces, then the
four Ontario sections would then have to be re-combined into a single VE3
multiplier. I'm sure the Ontarians would not be pleased. And the three
northern provinces (Yukon, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut) would also have
to be split up and counted separately. Given the lack of VE8 and VYØ stations,
I'm sure the collectors of Clean Sweep mugs would not be pleased, either :-)
Am I correct in ascertaining that what you're really asking for is a Canadian
multiplier list neither entirely section nor province, but rather a hybrid:
VE1, VE9, VY2, VO1, VO2, VE2, VE3-ONN, VE3-ONE, VE3-ONS, VE3-GTA, VE4, VE5,
VE6, VE7, and NT (VY1-VE8-VYØ). What do we call them - secvinces, proctions,
or what?
I have no power to effect any of this - I just want to understand what you and
fellow Mari-you-know-whatters are actually asking for in the grand scheme of
things.
73, Ward N0AX
On 10/30/2014 4:58 PM, Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA wrote:
The ARRL sponsored NCJ sprints require MAR, whereas the ARRL NCJ NA QSO parties
allow Provinces.
Some ARRL contests require MAR, whereas some require NB, NS & PEI. There seems
to be little in the way of consistency.
Thankfully, the overwhelming majority of worldwide contests, including 90% of
state run QSO parties allow “NB, NS or PEI.”
(The California QSO party being the holdout)…..folks are usually tickled when
they work VE9 for a new mult.
The continuous staunch retort from (my good friends at) the ARRL seems to say
“We follow RAC sections”, and apparently that’s that-end of discussion. .
…however if you look down the list of ARRL contests very carefully, you’ll see
only a percentage of them do. (50%?) I don’t know – I would have to count them.
Does it matter if I said 40% or 65% really?
Even the hugely popular RAC contests here at home say “send your province”……I
have sent “NB” in every Canada Day or Canada Winter contest that I have entered
since “RAC” was the CARF. I live in NB not a fictitious “Maritime Province”.
By saying “we follow RAC”……no, you really don’t. You only follow RAC sections
for *S-O-M-E* of the ARRL sponsored contests. ( I reckon not even most of them)
I still also stand by the fact that no other States or Provinces are lumped
together with other States or Provinces to create a section. (DC is the
exception, but it is not a State ) I have new information given to me today
that once upon a time Georgia, SC and Cuba (of all places) was a section, but
that must surely been before I was born, or at least the Bay of Pigs affair.
Hey, I don’t expect anyone to jump right up and change things overnight, but
look, I’ve been a VE9 for 21 years (and a ham much longer than that). I am
not CURRENTLY a RAC member, but have been in the past. I was even a volunteer
for the RAC VHF frequency committee for VE3DS and certainly do my part to
represent VE9 (NB) in the RAC contests out of an unwritten devotion to RAC even
though admittedly they are not my favorite contests.
Usually I feel my voice is never heard and over time I will let my RAC
membership lapse.
All I am saying is that (for whatever reason) we have multiple sections in
Ontario and every other Province has their own section. Isn’t it time for the
ARRL to get onboard with 95% of other worldwide contests and recognize that
it’s time to recognize that ALL contests under the ARRL banner should treat us
equally out here?
It sure would be nice to hear from Geoff Bowden on this issue. I have RAC
folks (VE9MY and VY2LI) who’ve heard our concerns. We have RAC representation
in every province including NB, NS and PEI (and Newfoundland/Labrador). I am
not entirely certain where they stand, but if it takes someone from RAC to
initiate a change or someone from the ARRL like N3KN or K1ZZ to pick up the
phone and call Manitoba and speak with VE4BAW, to see what needs to be done I’d
gladly pay the long distance charges. I see people at ARRL and RAC nodding,
but nobody is even CONSIDERING our request and nobody is even talking.
Thanks for your time.
Mike VE9AA “NB”
Mike, Coreen & Corey
Keswick Ridge, NB
From: Gerry Hull [mailto:gerry@yccc.org]
Sent: October 30, 2014 4:31 PM
To: Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA
Cc: CQ-Contest; ve5sf@rac.ca
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Move to disband MAR section in Canada (for contesting)
As a ex-pat Maritimer, I'd agree, from a contest perspective, it would be
wonderful to have the individual provinces as multipliers.
I'd hazard to guess, though, that the decision that drove Ontario to have
separate sections was not driven by contesting, but by the
size of the amateur population and administrative needs.
I'd say that boycotting contests that use MAR as the multiplier will hurt your
cause -- IF those in power were to consider contest activity one of the
factors in breaking up MAR into provinces, boycotting current contests would
definitely hurt!
So, count me in support of the effort, but let me counsel you to PARTICIPATE in
ARRL contests!
Here's hoping I work a bunch of MARs in SS CW -- I'll be VE1RM/3 or CG1RM/3
from ONE. (Ottawa is a closer drive than even St. John!)
73, Gerry W1VE
Also: VE1RM, VY2CDX, VE9XDX, VO1WIN
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
wrote:
The following is from Al, VA1MM but I 100% support him. See my own (VE9AA)
comments below his:
VA1MM:
A group of us contesters here in the "MAR" section feel the time has come to
announce the end of the MAR section in not only ARRL contests but all
contests. When our Department of Communications (now Industry Canada)
granted us separate prefixes for New Brunswick (VE9), Nova Scotia (VE1) and
Prince Edward Island (VY2), they recognized they we were distinct Provinces
with enough Amateur Radio operators to support a distinct call sign. And as
multipliers go, why wouldn't you want to have three new districts to work
when multiplied by six bands you have a substantial increase in your scores.
We have tried to weigh the pros and cons, the only con would be the contest
software not keeping up with the change or the operator not downloading the
newest version, but do we wait forever? Ontario (VE3) lead the way with
their divisional split, now it's time for the Maritimes to be recognized as
NS, NB and PEI
Thank-you, Al VA1MM/ VE1AWP (NS) Maritime Contest Club Member
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
VE9AA, Mike says:
I've been moaning and groaning about this very thing for years and years.
SOME ARRL contests force us to send MAR (a very antiquated section) and some
permit us to send NB, NS and PEI (the provinces where we are)
Meanwhile, places like Ontario recently get 4 (count them) FOUR sections?
What the??? Do we not exist out here or what????
What if we were to combine RI, DE and ME? Who in W1 would go for that
section>? \RIDEME\
Prior to 1993, all NB, NS and PEI's were VE1's...*BUT*, News Flash> In 1993
us "VE1's" all got NEW distinct callsign prefixes
ie: NB=VE9, NS=VE1 and PEI=VY2...there are very few left that kept their
original VE1 calls in NB or PEI. (the NS guys got to keep their VE1's)...
We are distinct provinces, (have been for eons.) just as Maine, Rhode Island
and Delaware are. Maybe it made sense in the old days or whatever to have
us as one section as there are fewer hams here (and we were all VE1's) , but
I think you'll see as a fellow member of MCC also, that we are well
represented these days. As a point of interest, there are so many VE1's that
they also have a VA1 prefix to choose from. If it's based on activity (I
know it's not) there are certainly ARRL and RAC sections with less activity
than NB, NS and PEI.
Even in the RAC contests we send "NB,NS and PE" so saying you "follow RAC"
does not hold water, nor does it even make sense 2+ decades later.
I normally try to boycott most contests that force us to send "MAR" as a
silent protest. Probably nobody notices but there are others like me out
here.
Get with the times ARRL, CQP and a very select few others.
I don't know who's attention we need to get, but help us out. Rattle some
chains. Send emails to those you know,
"RAC" is not contest oriented. Why we have to follow that structure (but
only for some contests) is beyond me !?!?
Respectfully,
Mike VE9AA (proudly in NB)
Mike, Coreen & Corey
Keswick Ridge, NB
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|