I use the AS-RXFEP RX Front End Protector on each of my IC-7800s.
http://www.arraysolutions.com/images/AS-RXFEPdatasheet.pdf
I operate my station as a SO2R, M/S or Multi-2 station. The AS-RXFEPs have
been in service since I
purchased my 2nd radio.
I am a satisfied customer with no financial interest in Array Solutions.
Bill N3RR
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Jeff Blaine
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:41 PM
To: Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA; cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R technical questions
Putting some sort of front end protection on the rig when working out the
coupling and isolation issues is a great idea. I've never fried anything in
the last 6 years of So2r fooling about.
However, it can happen. A couple of weeks back I literally got my wires
crossed when running a test on a rig and ended up dumping 100W into my main
station rig. Fortunately replacing the ailing board was not difficult but
it was expensive.
Assuming your rig has facilities for a RX antenna, something like this is
really cheap insurance...
http://www.dxengineering.com/parts/dxe-rg-5000
73/jeff/ac0c
www.ac0c.com
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Blaine
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 7:07 PM
To: Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA ; cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R technical questions
Mike,
I want to caution you on one point. From a receiver frying standpoint, the
use of the amp is not at all the threat magnifier that you would think it
is. It's very easy to fry rigs with "only 100W." 100->1500 is around 13
dB. So 100W is around 50 dBm, and 1500W is around 63 dBm. To put that in
perspective, a good rule of thumb is that you don't want the 2nd rig to ever
see anything over 0 dBm. By point is not to diminish the 13 db, but rather
to illustrate that even with 100W, getting to "safe" is not a trivial
exercise.
Get VJN's book and focus on the isolation. The shack side gear for
switching, etc, will be steered more by the mode you run and how much of an
automatic life you want. Those are all convenience things - isolation is
about first keeping the 2nd rig from getting blasted away by the first, and
secondly, about suppressing the harmonic and desense caused by one rig to
the other - so that you can actually do some work on the 2nd rig when the
first is transmitting.
Good luck!
73/jeff/ac0c
www.ac0c.com
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 5:52 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R technical questions
Just occurred to me that I had both preamps engaged in radio 2 which is an
IC746. It's S-meter seems overly generous anyways. Looks like 2nd and 3rd
harmonics are more like S9+10dB with no preamps on. (only time I would need
them would be maybe on a quiet 10m band to pull out super weak signals).the
initial "spike" is higher, which I think is a function of the Icom digital S
meters which I really don't like.
So, at constant S9+10dB readings (initial spike higher).solid dashes @ 30wpm
CW.am I safe?
Is there a better way to measure? FM mode? Readings with a scope of some
kind or ?
Thanks
Mike VE9AA
Mike, Coreen & Corey
Keswick Ridge, NB
From: Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA [mailto:ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca]
Sent: January 20, 2015 5:40 PM
To: 'cq-contest@contesting.com'
Subject: SO2R technical questions
How can I tell if I have too much energy at the input of "radio 2" when
transmitting on "radio 1" ?
I've done a few DXpeditions and field days (CY0AA, CY9AA etc.) and we had
some cheapie bandpass filters and some rapidly made crappy coax stubs
(without using any kind of device other than a calculator and a measuring
tape to verify the correct lengths).
At times we operated w/o one or both (both LP and QRO) and sure, we had
interference, but nobody blew up a rig.
Now nearly 2 decades later I am just barely dipping my toe into the SO2R
waters so with N1MM+'s help, today hooked up my Winkey to 2 rigs (IC7410 &
746) and when transmitting on a wide variety of antennas on radio one (HF9V,
A3S, Inverted L's for 80/160), and limiting radio 2 to only a ZS6BKW as an
inverted Vee (G5RV like) antenna about 50-60' away from all the various
antennas, harmonics were fair to bad, but not what I would call severe. (no
stubs, no BPF's, nuttin' but air).
CW peaks looked like around *50-60/S9 and steady dits were *40/9 if those
cheezie Icom bar-graph S-meters are to be believed. *(if I was on the exact
2nd or 3rd harmonic frequency)
Is this too much signal?
I can build some coax stubs over time...and I am working on a YCCC SO2R box
as time permits but don't have a lot of spare dough for BPF's (2 of them
would run me $1200-$1400 CDN by the time I had them in the shack)
nor a SIX-PAK(another $1k_), thus I am wondering about cutting costs going
in. Another local tried SO2R, didn't like it and had spent many thousands.
I don't have the spare dosh, nor will I, hence my question..
If I am willing to leave the amp turned off (sigh..), and antennas will all
be separated only 50', how do I know if I have too much signal at the input
of the 'other' radio?
Oh and feel free to school me on SO2R...I have nearly googled the internet
dry, so have done lots of reading, so if you have a web page up, I've likely
seen it ;-) Just never tried it.
Technique is what I lack.
I figured it was time. I find myself (especially in CW contests) calling CQ
and ALT-TABBING over to check my email, surf the net, watch the greyline
maps, stare out the window , talking to family etc. a LOT in contests.
Is SO2R the next step?
Mike VE9AA
p.s.- I will sorely miss using the amp, but if I try SO2R @ 100w and like
it, maybe I can stumble onto some cheap 419 BPF's and a 6-pack somewhere
later on. I don't care a hoot about automation. I like to flick the
switches manually.
Mike, Coreen & Corey
Keswick Ridge, NB
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5645 / Virus Database: 4260/8970 - Release Date: 01/21/15
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|