To: | CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW - Proposed rule changes. |
From: | brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk> |
Reply-to: | brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk> |
Date: | Sun, 24 May 2015 04:42:15 +0000 (UTC) |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
- - - I am really puzzled and exasperated by this continued debate as to what constitutes assistance. What is there not to understand? Let's get back to basics. Our hobby is ham radio, radio being the operative word. Radio, cw or voice, is an audio mode, not in any way a visual mode, we detect it by hearing and information acquired in any other way is assistance - end of. If guys use any other means of gathering information, including cw decoders, then what is the big deal why they should not enter the 'Assisted' category? Beats me. 73 Brian C4Z / 5B4AIZ. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed rule changes, Dennis McAlpine |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed rules changes, Trent Sampson |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Proposed contest rules, KQ2O via CQ-Contest |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW - Proposed rule changes., David Gilbert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |