I think ARRL already does break out geographic regions as well as division
clusters for at least some of their contests in their full results
articles. See, for example:
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/ContestResults/2014/2014%20ARRL%20DX%20CW%20-%20Full%20Results%20-%20Version%201_14.pdf
73, Dave K3ZJ
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > My opinion is that regional-based reporting and operator comparison works
> > a lot better and is actually close to comparing apples to apples.
>
>
> Perhaps QST could be persuaded to list regional top five scores for ALL
> ARRL contests, and the ARRL to actively promote the sponsoring of plaques
> for same?
>
> 73 jeff wk6i
>
> --
> Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com
> Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
> Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|