CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] LY9W ? - time to ban SCP?

To: <CQ-Contest@CONTESTING.COM>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] LY9W ? - time to ban SCP?
From: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:33:59 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
SCP is no worse than skimmers or packet.

Once you've opened those barrels of worms, you've already cheated yourself from skills (1) once learned, twice forgotten; (2) that you were never taught; (3) that measure your proficiency in radio communications - assuming that is/was a laudable goal in what we once purported to do.

Absent these skills, radio contesting has sadly morphed into computer games upon which my 4 year-old grandson can probably beat most of us.

For the under-signed, after 60 years of 'what was once serious contesting' - I'm now forced to admit that the thrill is gone, and I'm limiting myself to one contest/year; significantly the CQ WW CW. See you in November.

Other than that, forget about it.............

Vy 73

Jim Neiger  N6TJ

-----Original Message----- From: jpescatore--- via CQ-Contest
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 4:02 AM
To: CQ-Contest@CONTESTING.COM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] LY9W ? - time to ban SCP?

This really is a good topic for one of those Contest Sponsor surveys of the contesting community.


SCP, history files, zone autofill, auto dupe checking, even auto beam heading are all "automated operating aids" that replaced either human skills or hard copy operating aids because the technology enabled integrating it into contest logging software.


Contest "octopusses" were once going to be the end of contesting, but now SO2R boxes are commonly accepted use of technology to enable an equipped operator to vastly out-perform an unequipped operator.


The flip side of technology is that the contest sponsors get to use it too - we are now routinely judged on accuracy and the bar for acceptable accuracy is way higher than it was in the paper logging days. It is also way more fun to make 4200 hundred "technology assisted" contacts with a small number of dupes across 48 hours than it was to make 2500 with lots of dupes using paper and pen.


Genies do get put back in bottles, as in rules against certain types of swim suits or car modifications in competitive swimming and car racing. It is up to the contest sponsors and the overall sense of the competitors to decide, there are not absolutes.


Personally, I'd fill out the survey saying SCP and history files should only be used in an assisted category and would actually like to see zone autofill fit in that category. Autofill based on the current contest log, like dupe checking and during contest exchange fill and comparison, I could see being allowed with being considered assistance.


73 John K3TN


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>