CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area activity

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area activity
From: 4O3A <4o3a@t-com.me>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:17:33 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Exactly.



On 9/15/2015 7:24 AM, Zoli Pitman HA1AG via CQ-Contest wrote:
Chris,

It is never too late.

You can simply say, sorry we were wrong, we made the wrong assumptions and change the items Braco has mentioned for the rest of the qualification period. A good leader would be able to realize mistakes made and correct them for the good.

Simple.

Zoli HA1AG



On 9/14/2015 23:04, Braco OE1EMS wrote:
Chris and others

Ist pretty simple

Just take a look into statistic and you will see
that according activity and avg points EU #5 is most difficult category in EU 908 Ops generating all most same number of total points like 1450 Ops from EU #3 I would say that much more active Ops from EU #5 are serious contester as from other EU groups!
And EU #5 have  smallest nr of TL spots!

This was a issue as well b4 just after you send out the rules

Another issue which became very true
are 12 contest in 2 years
same points for LP and HP
and score reduction for MS

1st
in EU#5 we have about 6-8 very active contester, this means you need to be active in every contest
not only 12 and not allow to others to generate points.
3 TL spots are just to less for this group....we use to have 5 of them b4

2nd
Multi Op category are dead for period of qualifications.....none of big contest teams are anymore QRV
Only SO participation! Is this good? I don’t think so!

3rd
LP vs. HP
Somehow LP category became very popular....maybe to easy to gain 3-6 dB more without producing monster signal on the bands! I don’t know, but somehow some LP Ops did kick my ass in pileups during the WAE.....strange somehow and I don’t use small antennas !!!!

4th
900 points for WAG
1000 points for WAE

VS

800 points for EUHFC
950 points for WPX

Nice to try to generate more activity in German contest but let us be realistic....... maybe next time


However those failures could be avoided b4...i know now is to late for any changes (or not) but maybe next WRTC organizer will consider more contesters ideas as anything else!

and...... I don’t think that qualifications will find out who are the best Ops for WRTC
Its much more of using better station as others ....or being big gun !


73s
Braco
E77DX





-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] Im Auftrag von 4O3A Ranko
Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. September 2015 21:11
An: Christian Janssen DL1MGB
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com; qualification@wrtc2018.de
Betreff: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area activity

Hi Chris,

I am commenting some parts of rules, with hope that organizer will think about it, even if don’t change anything.

-Yes, this is clear that we have to accept rules, if want to compete.
-Yes, it is clear that you are organizer and it gives you right to make your own rules.

Somehow, I feel that we all are big contest family, and every well-intentioned comment is welcome? I do not remember that any of my earlier comments were senseless? So, your very useful statistic and number of teams per area are not correlating. I gave you solution what I would do, but it’s fine if nothing will be changed. Maybe next organizer will take some benefit out of it.

Sorry if I disturb you, will pay a big beer when meet you next time J "Niksicko pivo" rulez!

73
Ranko


On 9/13/2015 7:22 PM, Christian Janssen DL1MGB wrote:
Hi Ranko,

to be honest I really didn't understand your point (if there was one).

If you are still complaining about the rules, it is too late. The
rules are set, the same rules for everybody.

Those who want to qualify for WRTC2018, have to accept the rules.
Nobody is forced to participate if he doesn't want to or has problems
with the rules.

If your point was a different one, please tell me.

73s Chris DL1MGB


Am 13.09.2015 um 18:56 schrieb 4O3A Ranko:
Hi Chris,

I know of course, but you did not understood my point.

73
Ranko




On 9/13/2015 6:31 PM, Christian Janssen DL1MGB wrote:
Hi Ranko,

many thanks for your feedback.

I am sorry to hear that you don't know the final numbers of team
leaders. But we already took care of this. Since November 2014 we
provide qualification rules on our website:

http://www.wrtc2018.de/index.php/en/wettbewerb-2

In these rules you can read about the numbers of team leaders from
each qualification area.

If you have more questions about the qualification rules, don't
hesitate to contact us.

Good luck with your qualification!

73s Chris DL1MGB
President WRTC2018 Organizing Committee




Am 13.09.2015 um 10:31 schrieb Ranko Boca:
Hi Christian

I saw area activity statistic on your WEB page-excellent! *
http://www.wrtc2018.de/index.php/en/wettbewerb-2/standings-2?task=a
reaactivity


(

It's self explanatory.This statistics can be used as accurate tool
for making fair decision of the number of participants from each
region. For example - we even do not know final numbers of Team
leader per area, and it will be defined by statistic when
qualifying period is over. You just make an formula :-) Fair and
exciting. Maybe even it can increase some activities?

Current statistics indicate a disproportionate numbers of team
leaders in some areas.

73
Ranko
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4830 / Virus Database: 4365/10633 - Release Date:
09/13/15



-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4830 / Virus Database: 4365/10633 - Release Date:
09/13/15


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4830 / Virus Database: 4365/10642 - Release Date: 09/15/15

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>