Kelly has nailed this one. It is appropriate that we take reasonable care to
equalize competition within a simple system. For example.
1) Let's separate high and low power
2) Lets separate assisted operation
3) Lets separate when more than one person operates, or more than one
transmitter.
4) Let's divide up results by geographical area.
Sound familiar? Yes, one could go farther, but where does it end?
Beyond that, most competition in most sports for most of us is within your own
sphere of activity. I will never win CQ WW for many reasons, only one of which
is because I'm not the best operator. I don’t expect the rules to equalize the
fact that I have one tower with a 2-el yagi, or that I am in Kansas. I know
what my achievements with respect to others in similar circumstance. I have
fun, and set my own idea of achievement.
That does not mean that I am against, as one example, a distance based scoring
system. That’s an interesting system, and I think others should experiment
with it. But it is not a proven equalizer, and you don’t fine tune a system by
throwing away the current rules and starting over. So, some smaller contest
other than SP should try it. Is anyone interested?
73,
Drew K3PA
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Kelly
Taylor
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2015 19:54
To: Contesting Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Leveling the playing field
So, Fernando is upset he can’t compete with the Aruba-Bonaire-Curaçao crowd.
Hmmm. Welcome to the club!
He doesn’t like that the rules leave in place a natural propagational
advantage, plus the added points of being in South America, which means he
can’t beat them.
Maybe some people are unhappy they can’t beat Fernando? Hell, from here, we’d
be happy to beat virtually any member of Team Hennepin! (That’s an MWA
reference, reflecting the advantage Minneapolis has over Winnipeg, despite
being at a disadvantage overall.)
Fernando: if you want to level the playing field, you have to do it for
everybody, and that could put you at an even greater disadvantage than you are
now. Be careful what you wish for, you might get it.
Of course, the advice when anybody mentions the disadvantage of the Black Hole,
where RF goes to die, is simple: MOVE! Can’t really argue that point. I’d have
a lot more fun if I lived in Nova Scotia, but that ain’t going to happen so I’m
just going to accept what I got.
So, with all that in mind, I propose (jokingly) the following handicapping
system.
Black Hole? Add 10 per cent to your score for every degree more distant from
the equator. Only applies to W0, VE4,5,6 and northwestern VE3. OK, maybe
certain parts of K9, too. (Because the Black Hole covers part of Russia, too,
but not nearly as southward-stretching as here, those degrees are counted from
the Tropic of Cancer.) In all cases, must submit proof the Black Hole hovered
over your station for at least half the contest hours.
Small station? Set K3LR as the benchmark. For every antenna element you have
fewer than K3LR, add 1 per cent. For every element MORE than K3LR, subtract one
per cent. So, if Tim has 200 elements and you have a C3SS, add (200-7=193%).
No Alphas? So, set the 9500 as the benchmark: for every watt less of input
power to your tubes than the maximum dissipation of the Alpha, add 10 per cent.
(For every watt more, subtract 10 per cent).
ABC? Subtract 25 per cent from you score. (The Spanish/Portuguese islands?
Subtract 20 per cent.)
VK/ZL/southern Asia? Add one per cent to your score for every Q with greater
than 8,000-km distance.
Short towers? Total up the HAAT of your towers. If that number is less than the
total HAAT of W8JI, add one per cent for every foot of difference. (More?
Subtract one per cent for every foot.) Mountain stations multiply this number
by the inverse of their shack’s height ASL.
Are you in JA and the contest is still going on when you have to go to work?
Add one per cent for every hour of active contest time you lose.
Fernando: did I miss anything?
;=)
73, kelly
ve4xt
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|