CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SuperCheckPartial makes you assisted

To: "'Stu Phillips'" <stu@k6tu.net>, <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SuperCheckPartial makes you assisted
From: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:48:37 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
First WOW! and then Hallelujah. 
A few of us have been saying this for years that SCP is cheating in the
unassisted.
It's great to see common sense finally arriving and from the maintainer is
so significant.
And then followed with a  second revelation " When it comes to the spirit of
the rules - not what's written but what one personally thinks is right ..."
Another favorite belief of mine.
This is really going hit the cheaters hard and they will be getting all bent
and twisted out of shape over this one.
Enjoy the praise Stu; the biased moderators here will surely round file my
post.

Doug 

I wasn't born in Saskatchewan, but I got here as soon as I could.

-----Original Message-----

Posting emails likely to cause a proverbial s-storm is not my intent and
certainly not my standard MO. but my role as the maintainer of
SuperCheckPartial as well as a regular user of it in contests leave me
personally in no doubt.

Using Super Check Partial makes you assisted category in a contest.

Before you reach for the reply key to rip me a new one, let me start with a
couple of email snippets from a world class contester (who I respect greatly
BTW) reinforcing why I need to release SuperCheckPartial before this coming
weekend's CQ WW contest.

"It seems to me releasing the next SCP file a few days BEFORE CQWW CW would
make good sense and help many operators achieve a clearer log."

And.

"I hope you will reconsider since log accuracy is such an important
component in the success or failure for everyone in this event."

Emphasis added by me to make the point although no reconsideration was
required.  I do listen to feedback FWIW.

I'm sure like me you've had experience of using SCP to help pull a call sign
out of a pile up/QRM/QSB because it gives you a clue for the possible things
to listen for - of course, this can be a double edged sword as it can
convince you HEARD what you WANTED and so make a bad QLF.

How much more time do you spend verifying a call sign when it does NOT
appear in SCP versus when it does?  I know that I am doubly vigilant for a
call sign bust both on CW and Phone when the call is NOT shown in the SCP
window in my logger.  This improves my accuracy and my rate as I'm less
likely to double down on call sign verification.

In the end adherence to the letter and spirit of contest rules comes down to
individuals and their own decisions.  When it comes to the spirit of the
rules - not what's written but what one personally thinks is right, that's a
freedom of choice that I completely endorse and respect

For me going forward, I will submit my entries in the assisted category
whenever I use Super Check Partial - its clear that it helps with accuracy
and likely rate.  Just like using cluster spots or pre-fill files (another
set of thorn bushes I'm not going to touch).

Respectfully presented & 73

Stu K6TU

PS:  There will be a note going out shortly revising the SCP release
schedule to accommodate the feedback I've received (and folks difficulty in
planning ahead ;-).



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>