CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SuperCheckPartial makes you assisted

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SuperCheckPartial makes you assisted
From: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:13:53 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Ward,

Respectfully, we disagree on what the primary distinction is/should be.

73,

Mark, KD4D

On November 24, 2015 11:31:53 AM EST, Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com> wrote:
>I understand but I did not use the word "just" - meaning that is the 
>only distinction.  The primary distinction is what crosses the boundary
>
>but the sponsors can add any other criteria they want, such as 
>restricting the use of skimmers within the station boundary.
>
>73, Ward N0AX
>
>On 11/24/2015 10:09 AM, cq-contest-request@contesting.com wrote:
>> It is NOT just what crosses the station boundary or local skimmers
>(multi-channel decoders) would be permitted.
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>